I'm introducing a new feature on this blog, and I just couldn't resist the alliterative sound of "Wednesday's World Wide Web Wanderings." It's perhaps the most unwieldy blog-post title ever (in the future it will be shortened to "Web Wanderings" or something similarly more manageable!), but for today, at least, I harkened to the siren call of excess alliteration.
Anyway, so this new feature is a link round-up of sorts, a list of some of the articles I've read this week that I find interesting. And please note that I said "find interesting"--while I think these links are noteworthy, I may not necessarily agree with all of the opinions espoused there.
So what's interested me this week?

--I'm very much agreeing with
this blog post from another prospective adoptive parent adopting from Ethiopia about the importance of not conveying only negative aspects about a child's home country. In our eagerness to help our children's home countries, it can be all too easy to post about numbers of dying orphans or food shortages. We want to raise awareness, and that is admirable. However, a constant stream of images of starving children ultimately reduces a country's rich history to little more than a Sally Struthers infomercial. Worse still, it unintentionally teaches our children that their heritage is tainted, that they have nothing to be proud of in their home country. Instead, we all must highlight the many positive aspects of our children's birth cultures--both for our children's benefit and our own.

--From
The Times of South Africa, a lifestyle article called "
Black, White of Adopting," which explores the idea of transracial adoption from the perspective of a black single mother wanting to adopt a white baby. Personally, I think there's absolutely nothing wrong with that, but I was surprised to read the comments after the article and see so many objections--and not the kind of objections you might think. Very interesting, especially when filtered through the lens of South Africa's racial history.

--And more on transracial adoption...Dallas Cowboys' All-Pro linebacker
DeMarcus Ware and his wife recently adopted a beautiful baby girl. Nothing too extraordinary there, but this story seems to be getting an unusual amount of press (does the
New York Times send out a reporter for every pro-athlete's child?). I can't help but wonder if it's because the Wares are African-American, and their baby appears to be white. (Actually, I think the baby looks biracial, but everyone on the Internet seems to assume the baby is white, and I can't find a factual description one way or the other.)
For the record, I'm very happy for the Wares (especially after reading their story), and I think it's terrific that they're providing a loving, Christian family for this child. They seem like really neat people. But what's strange (and potentially problematic) is the press coverage--none of the
legitimate news articles about this story mention the baby's race, but they all include pictures. It's like race is the proverbial elephant in the room that journalists refuse to deal with directly, yet they make sure to prominently insert that picture. To what end, I wonder? I'd be curious to know what other people make of this press coverage (at least
one other person thinks it's kind of strange, too...).
2 comments:
Hi Kimberly. Thanks for linking to my blog. I'm now going to follow the other, interesting articles you have linked to.
Thanks for stopping by! Just left a comment at your place. =)
Post a Comment